P1987 - Real Time Maximum Insertion Pain in Unsedated Colonoscopy - Water Exchange vs Water Exchange Plus Cap: A Multi-Site, Multi-Investigator Randomized Controlled Trial in Veterans
Sepulveda ACC/VAGLAHS/UCLA North Hills, California
Felix W. Leung, MD, FACG1, Ramsey Cheung, MD, PhD2, Shai Friedland, MD3, Noam Jacob, MD4, Joseph Leung, MD, MACG5, Jennifer Pan, MD, MS2, Susan Y. Quan, MD2, James Sul, MD6, Andrew Yen, MD5, Nora Jamgotchian, MS1, Yu Chen, MD7, Dixit Vivek, PhD1, Aliya Sheikh, MS5, David Elashoff, PhD8, Angshuman Saha, MS8, Holly Wilhalme, MS8 1Sepulveda ACC/VAGLAHS/UCLA, North Hills, CA; 2VA Palo Alto Health Care System/Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; 3VA Palo Alto Health Care System/Standford University, Palo Alto, CA; 4VAGLAHS/UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; 5Sacramento VAMC, Veterans Affairs Northern California Healthcare System, Mather, CA; 6VAGLAHS, Los Angeles, CA; 7VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA; 8UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
Introduction: Water exchange (WE) and cap-assisted colonoscopy independently reduced insertion pain in unsedated colonoscopy. In pilot investigation, WE combined with cap (WECAC) lowered insertion pain. We hypothesize that real-time maximum insertion pain (RTMIP) is significantly lower in unsedated Veterans in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of WECAC vs. WE.
Methods: Veterans across 3 sites presenting for unsedated colonoscopy were recruited, randomized and examined by 9 colonoscopists. Demographic and patient characteristics were recorded. Subjects were blinded to method. The highest segmental pain (0=no pain, 9=worst pain) during insertion yielded the RTMIP. RTMIP was analyzed with logistic regression using binarized (0 or 1) RTMIP score with a threshold of 0.5 (“no pain” vs. “some pain”) and 7.5 (“no or manageable pain” vs. “severe pain”) as the dependent variable. p < 0.05 was significant.
Results: Screening (84), surveillance (180) and FIT+ (13) cases were included. WE (135) and WECAC (142) were successful in 93% and 92%, respectively. Failure was due to poor preparation (9), stricture (1), technical difficulty (3) and other (2). Table 1A shows racial/ethnic distributions. The mean RTMIP was low in both groups and did not differ (Table 1B). Logistic regression revealed LA & SAC site (p=0.0058), high volume of water infused (p=0.0111) and suctioned (p=0.0241) were significantly associated with no pain. Low body mass index (p=0.0124), poor self-reported health (p=0.0165), and low weight (p=0.0176) were significantly associated with “severe pain”. Colonoscopy method was not significant for any RTMIP cutoff. Adenoma detection rates and adenomas per colonoscopy were satisfactorily high in both groups (Table 1B).
Discussion: In a single (patient) blinded multicenter RCT, WE and WECAC similarly yielded high success and low RTMIP in a racially diverse group of male and female Veterans. This study attests to both the feasibility of unsedated colonoscopy in those without escort and its utility in providing alternative option and access to Veterans who would otherwise have to forgo colonoscopy, including for urgent indications (e.g., FIT+). Intention-to-treat analysis showed high success rates and high adenoma detection rates ( >45%), consistent with quality examinations. Suction of all infused water during insertion (as original WE) is associated with pain reduction and addition of a cap does not further reduce it. Inadequate water exchange and patient specific factors contribute to high RTMIP.
Table 1A: Racial/ethnic distribution.
LA
PA
SAC
Count
126
101
50
Age
67.7 (7.02)
68.5 (7.03)
64.5 (11.43)
Male
119 (94.4%)
97 (96%)
50 (100%)
Female
7 (5.6%)
4 (4%)
0 (0%)
White
84 (66.7%)
73 (72.3%)
30 (62.5%)
African American
33 (26.2%)
15 (14.9%)
13 (27.1%)
Asian
4 (3.2%)
5 (5%)
5 (10.4%)
Native American / Alaska Native
0 (0%)
1 (1%)
0 (0%)
Hawaiian / Pacific Islander
0 (0%)
6 (5.9%)
0 (0%)
Other
5 (4%)
1 (1%)
0 (0%)
Hispanic
22 (17.5%)
8 (7.9%)
2 (4.1%)
Non-Hispanic
104 (82.5%)
93 (92.1%)
47 (95.9%)
Table 1B: Real time maximum insertion pain and adenoma detection.
WE n=135
WECAC n=142
p
Overall RTMIP mean (SD)
2.6 (2.4)
2.9 (2.5)
0.890*
Binarized RTMIP
Method was not significant predictor for any cutoff*
Overall adenoma detection rate, n (%)
76 (55.1%)
69 (48.3%)
0.2527**
Adenoma per colonoscopy, mean (SD)
0.9 (1.03)
0.8 (0.98)
0.1867***
Disclosures:
Felix Leung indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Ramsey Cheung indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Noam Jacob indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Joseph Leung indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Jennifer Pan indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Susan Quan indicated no relevant financial relationships.
James Sul indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Andrew Yen indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Nora Jamgotchian indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Yu Chen indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Dixit Vivek indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Aliya Sheikh indicated no relevant financial relationships.
David Elashoff indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Angshuman Saha indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Holly Wilhalme indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Felix W. Leung, MD, FACG1, Ramsey Cheung, MD, PhD2, Shai Friedland, MD3, Noam Jacob, MD4, Joseph Leung, MD, MACG5, Jennifer Pan, MD, MS2, Susan Y. Quan, MD2, James Sul, MD6, Andrew Yen, MD5, Nora Jamgotchian, MS1, Yu Chen, MD7, Dixit Vivek, PhD1, Aliya Sheikh, MS5, David Elashoff, PhD8, Angshuman Saha, MS8, Holly Wilhalme, MS8. P1987 - Real Time Maximum Insertion Pain in Unsedated Colonoscopy - Water Exchange vs Water Exchange Plus Cap: A Multi-Site, Multi-Investigator Randomized Controlled Trial in Veterans, ACG 2023 Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts. Vancouver, BC, Canada: American College of Gastroenterology.